Mmmh yep, it seems that you are right. Probably the tag is not so useful as I supposed. Ok, in this case just forget about my previous message, I will set the filter basing on the recipient address.
Regards, -- Giuseppe 2017-07-06 18:01 GMT+02:00 Brett Ryan <[email protected]>: > How would it help? IMHO it's redundant since anything to the netcat > mailing list would always be for the current netcat program. For any mail > rules use the mailing list address itself. > > > On 7 Jul 2017, at 01:39, Luca Mambretti <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I might be wrong here, but I suspect the above mentioned tag was > automatically added by the "old and obsolete" mailing list, someone with > actual knowledge of the old mailing list might want to add a more > correct/proven answer. > > > > I can say for sure I never bothered adding any tag during the previous 3 > NC projects I've taken part in. > > > > Not a big deal thou will try to remember the tags from now on. > > > > Regards, > > Luca. > > ----- Messaggio originale ----- > > Da: "Giuseppe Tino" <[email protected]> > > A: "netcat" <[email protected]> > > Inviato: Giovedì, 6 luglio 2017 17:34:03 > > Oggetto: [90cat] <-- we should use this tag at the start of the subject. > > > > Hi, > > I suggest to start the subject of the mails sent to the NetCat mailing > list > > with the tag [90cat] as we did for the previous NetCat editions. In this > > way who want can set up a specific mail filter and keep the mailbox more > > organized. > > Thanks, > > > > > > -- > > Giuseppe >
