On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:43:37PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: > > > On 15.11.2016 14:18, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:13:01PM +0300, Nikolay Shirokovskiy wrote: > >> It could be useful to dumpxml of slaves/subordinates too to introspect > >> host interfaces tree in dephts. Now it is not possible: > >> 'Interface eth0 does not exist or is not a toplevel interface'. > >> Has it some deeper meaning or netcf can be enhanced? (and *libvirt* as > >> well). > > > > The netcf API / libvirt Interface APIs are designed to work against the > > concept of logical network connections, which may comprise multiple > > physical interfaces. They are explicitly *not* a way to query all > > individual physical interfaces - that's what libvirt's node device APIs > > are for. > > > > I donno. AFAIU you can start with bridge and unslaved physical interface. > They are both > in list and can be dumped. Then you enslave interface to the bridge via > netcf's define > and then physical interface can not be reached anymore. If I can not change > host interfaces > tree then it would be ok I guess.
That is expected behaviour. You originally had 2 separate logical connections, and you've changed the system to have a single logical connection. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| _______________________________________________ netcf-devel mailing list -- netcf-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to netcf-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
