On Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:21:36 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:50:41AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 10:06:45 +0200 > > Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm interested in doing more complex stuff on inbound packets than > > > what is currently possible with ing_filter (I understand ingress > > > doesn't allow child classes , and can only drop/pass packets, not > > > store one to send it later). > > > > > > While this is understandable because it would conflict with the > > > benefits of NAPI by queueing and dropping packets much later, it > > > prevents me from using Linux instead of FreeBSD's Dummynet (I'm > > > working on network emulation-related stuff). > > > > > Why not just fix netem to work on imq? > > I might look at that. What's the problem with netem & imq ? > > Also, I'm not sure I understand the difference between the "redirect > to imq" and the "redirect to dummy" approaches. I haven't tried it. There might be issues with scheduling assumptions and/or used of skb->cb[] but it should be solvable without too much work. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
