[ Cleaning up Cc list ] On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 12:34:00AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > Looking at the latest traces Vladimir sent me, there is another case, > > too. > > Yes, but nat_packet checks if manips have actually been set up before > touching the packet. This can never happen for the untracked entry > because it is initialized with IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK in ip_nat_core. > I guess we can remove this now: > > /* Initialize fake conntrack so that NAT will skip it */ > ip_conntrack_untracked.status |= IPS_NAT_DONE_MASK; Yes, that is true. However, we shouldn't push that immediately and test it before mainline inclusion. I'm still trying to add a testcase for the original problem to the nfsim-testsuite, so we can verify the problem is gone. -- - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
pgpsU2siBBsRw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
