Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:48:45PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

I understand removing the NULL pointers, but .name is actually a string
"NULL".. Leaving it to be NULL is not a very good idea. This "NULL"
algorithm was designed for cases where there is default algorithm for
encryption and encryption needs to be disabled for a specific station.
In other words, userspace programs will be asking for an algorithm
called "NULL".


Yeah, I missed that.  Jeff, can you fix that before applying or should
I resend?

Please resend updated patch.



Index: linux-2.6/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c      2005-09-05 
14:38:19.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6/net/ieee80211/ieee80211_crypt.c   2005-09-06 14:14:01.000000000 
+0200

Would you be kind enough to resend -again-, rediff'd against latest upstream git tree?

        Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to