Stefan Rompf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't want the kernel to remove these routes, that would be broken.
Why exactly? They would be brought back when the carrier raises again, of course. > I want > them be marked as inactive or unusable and being ignored by the routing > decision while in this state. Why do we need inactive or unusable routes in the kernel? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
