On Sun, 2006-19-02 at 00:42 -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > From: jamal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:56:44 -0500 > > > [1]I have to put a disclaimer: I am always a stickler as far as RED > > is concerned (Thomas can testify to that) because it is very > > delicate (not the code rather the algorithm) and i have suffered a > > lot in the past getting those parameters tuned. There was a gent who > > was interested in putting together regression tests for RED but he > > keeps disappearing on us. > > There is a limit to how far you can apply this limitation on other > people. Nobody can touch RED in any significant way because of this > roadblock. > > I would say it's justified if you had some full regression suite you > were working on, but you're not and you won't be able to cook one up > any time soon. > > There is a point at which the folks doing the work get to make the > decisions, and that is leaning towards Patrick and others at this > point. I think I have sufficiently expressed my views and progress needs to be made; therefore I ACK the patch.
Note the definition of "work" is very highly debatable as to be just constrained to producing code but i think thats a different discussion that perhaps is better suited for a slot in netconf. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
