Roland Dreier wrote:
 > +struct rdma_ucm_query_route_resp {
 > + __u64 node_guid;
 > + struct ib_user_path_rec ib_route[2];
 > + struct sockaddr_in6 src_addr;
 > + struct sockaddr_in6 dst_addr;
 > + __u32 num_paths;
 > + __u8 port_num;
 > + __u8 reserved[3];
 > +};

Is there a 32-bit/64-bit compatibility problem here?  From a quick
look, struct sockaddr_in6 is not 8-byte aligned.

Unless I miss counted, they should be aligned. ib_user_path_rec is defined near the end of patch 1/6.

+struct ib_user_path_rec {
+       __u8    dgid[16];
+       __u8    sgid[16];
+       __be16  dlid;
+       __be16  slid;
+       __u32   raw_traffic;
+       __be32  flow_label;
+       __u32   reversible;
+       __u32   mtu;
+       __be16  pkey;
+       __u8    hop_limit;
+       __u8    traffic_class;
+       __u8    numb_path;
+       __u8    sl;
+       __u8    mtu_selector;
+       __u8    rate_selector;
+       __u8    rate;
+       __u8    packet_life_time_selector;
+       __u8    packet_life_time;
+       __u8    preference;
+};

- Sean

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to