From: "Boris B. Zhmurov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 17:29:09 +0400
> Hello, Herbert Xu. > > On 30.03.2006 14:12 you said the following: > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 10:02:01AM +0000, Boris B. Zhmurov wrote: > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] linux-2.6.16]$ patch -p1 < > >>../../../SOURCES/linux-2.6.16-e1000-try-to-fix-assertion_sk_forward_alloc_failed_by_Herbert_Xu.patch > >> > >> > >>patching file drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c > >>Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] > >> > >>Herbert, is that patch already included in 2.6.16.1? > > > > > > Not really. It's just patch being silly (or too smart :) > > > > Here it is again rediffed against 2.6.16. > > > Nope, with this patch the problem still exists. After 25 min. uptime > with patched kernel 2.6.16.1, I have: Can you please double and triple check that you're really running a kernel with the fix from Herbert applied? I make this mistake all the time :-) Thanks. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
