On 16-03-03 10:05 AM, Phil Sutter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 09:21:55AM -0500, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
On 16-03-02 01:19 PM, Phil Sutter wrote:
+ fprintf(stderr, " unreachable | prohibit | blackhole | nat
}\n");
Dont think nat exists anymore...
But iproute2 seems to still support it? At least it's listed in
rtnl_rtntype_a2n().
The entry for RTN_NAT in net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c though looks like just
a stub. But at least it hasn't changed since the beginning of Git.
According to ip-route.8 it's indeed non-functional.
I only concerned help text and man page consistency, and since the man
page lists it (with a useful hint about it's state), the help text
should contain it either. Or do you think that's misleading?
Yeah it is gone. The cloud providers i know of that needed stateless
nat use tc nat.
cheers,
jamal
