Hi Ido,

Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com> writes:

>>+     case NETDEV_PRECHANGEUPPER:
>
> Why do you need this here? It seems you are always ignoring it in
> dsa_slave_port_upper_event()? Probably better to introduce it when you
> actually need it.
>
> Other than that, it looks good to me.

I've prepare a real v1 without this switch case locally, I'll send it in
a few moment unless there are other comments.

Thanks Ido!
Vivien

Reply via email to