David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> writes: > From: Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> > Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:31:48 +0200 > >> I know I'm late now that merge window was opened yesterday but here's >> one more set of patches I would like to get to 4.6 still. There isn't >> anything controversial so I hope this should be still safe to pull. The >> patches have been in linux-next since Friday and I haven't seen any >> reports about issues. But if you think it's too late just let me know >> and I'll resubmit these for 4.7. >> >> The most notable part here of course is rtl8xxxu with over 100 patches. >> As the driver is new and under heavy development I think they are ok to >> take still. Otherwise there are mostly fixes with an exception of adding >> a new debugfs file to wl18xx. >> >> Please let me know if you have any problems. > > Pulled, thanks.
Great, thanks a lot. > I really like Jes's work and I wish you had integrated it several > months ago, instead of sloshing him needlessly through a non-stop > cycle of very nit-picky issues, just FYI. I also like his work and I'm sorry for being too nit-picky. I have tried to be extra careful with the patches I send to you, especially with new drivers, and I guess I have been too pedantic. I'll try to lower the bar to a more reasonable level. But I actually started to wonder what you actually mean and checked the dates of initial rtl8xxxu submission from patchwork: 2015-08-29 v1 2015-08-30 v2 2015-10-15 v3 2015-10-21 applied 26f1fad29ad9 to w-d-next for v4.4 Two months is quite long for a good driver like this but IIRC the initial commit was pending wireless-drivers directory reorganisation, and that just took too long on my side. -- Kalle Valo
