On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:45 PM, Xin Long <lucien....@gmail.com> wrote:
> yeah, because port fdb_flush is called by brport_store(), in the
> common function.
> do you think it''s redundant if we add a notification in bridge
> fdb_flush to keep
> consistence with port fdb_flush?
just change it on patch 1/6.

Reply via email to