On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2016-03-31 at 10:39 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> writes: >> > On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 14:51 +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> > > Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> writes: >> > > > >> > > > Using the normal kernel logging mechanisms makes this code >> > > > a bit more like other wireless drivers. >> > > Personally I don't see the point but I don't have any strong opinions. A >> > > bigger problem is that TI drivers are not really in active development >> > > and that's I'm not thrilled to take big patches like this for dormant >> > > drivers. >> > Not very dormant. >> > >> > 35 patches in the last year, most of them adding functionality. >> Oh, I didn't realise it had that many patches. But the driver is >> orphaned and doesn't have a maintainer so could I then have an ack from >> one of the active contributors that this ok? > > Fine by me. > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f --git drivers/net/wireless/ti/ > > Kalle Valo <kv...@codeaurora.org> (maintainer:NETWORKING DRIVERS > (WIRELESS),commit_signer:27/35=77%) > Eliad Peller <el...@wizery.com> (commit_signer:9/35=26%,authored:7/35=20%) > Guy Mishol <g...@ti.com> (commit_signer:6/35=17%,authored:5/35=14%) > Johannes Berg <johannes.b...@intel.com> > (commit_signer:6/35=17%,authored:3/35=9%) > Uri Mashiach <uri.mashi...@compulab.co.il> > (commit_signer:4/35=11%,authored:4/35=11%) > > For those people now added to the cc list, > here's the original patch thread: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/7/1099
I don't have a strong opinion here either. (I do like the trailing newline being added automatically, but that's hardly an issue...) Eliad.