On 4/7/16, 6:41 PM, David Miller wrote:
> While auditing something unrelated, I noticed that this function seems
> to potentially dev_put() on an error pointer.
>
> I guess the problem comes from the fact that there are two methods
> by which the device pointer is obtained.
>
> First, inet{,6}_fib_lookup_dev() which uses error pointers.
>
> Second, dev_get_by_index() which returns a valid device or NULL,
> and therefore does not use error pointers.
>
> If inet{,6}_fib_lookup_dev() returns an error pointer, the !dev check
> will not pass and dev_put() will operate on an error pointer and
> crash.
>
> If you agree with my analysis, could you please cook up and test a
> fix?
>
> Thank you!
certainly!. I see it. Thanks for catching it.
I will test and post a fix in a few hours.
