"incvalue" variable holds a result of "er32(TIMINCA) & 
E1000_TIMINCA_INCVALUE_MASK"
and used in "do_div(temp, incvalue)" as a divisor.

Thus, "u64 incvalue" declaration is probably a mistake.
Even though it seems to be a harmless one, let's fix it.

Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
CC: Jeff Kirsher <[email protected]>
CC: Jesse Brandeburg <[email protected]>
CC: Shannon Nelson <[email protected]>
CC: Carolyn Wyborny <[email protected]>
CC: Don Skidmore <[email protected]>
CC: Bruce Allan <[email protected]>
CC: John Ronciak <[email protected]>
CC: Mitch Williams <[email protected]>
CC: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
CC: LKML <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 9b4ec13..967311b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -4300,7 +4300,8 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const struct 
cyclecounter *cc)
        }
 
        if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
-               u64 incvalue, time_delta, rem, temp;
+               u64 time_delta, rem, temp;
+               u32 incvalue;
                int i;
 
                /* errata for 82574/82583 possible bad bits read from SYSTIMH/L
-- 
1.8.1.4

Reply via email to