Nikolay Aleksandrov <niko...@cumulusnetworks.com> :
> On 04/27/2016 12:49 AM, Francois Romieu wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -1652,7 +1652,7 @@ pch_gbe_clean_tx(struct pch_gbe_adapter *adapter,
> >  
> >             netdev_dbg(adapter->netdev, "next_to_clean : %d\n",
> >                        tx_ring->next_to_clean);
> > -           spin_unlock(&tx_ring->tx_lock);
> > +           netif_tx_lock(adapter->netdev);
> 
> Shouldn't this be netif_tx_unlock ?

It should. Thanks for reviewing.

-- 
Ueimor

Reply via email to