From: James Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:10:50 -0400 (EDT)
> So, I propose to introduce a secmark field (per the patch below), which is > only present when enabled as a sub-feature of LSM. That is, it does not > have any effect at all for the default kernel. As an integer field, it > also does not require the kind of lifecycle management assoicated with > security blobs, which becomes invasive for skbs. I have no objections to this at all. And off-list I've gotten James to agree to be assigned to try and shrink SKB somehow in the future which is only fair :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
