From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
"incvalue" variable holds a result of "er32(TIMINCA) &
E1000_TIMINCA_INCVALUE_MASK" and used in "do_div(temp, incvalue)"
as a divisor.
Thus, "u64 incvalue" declaration is probably a mistake.
Even though it seems to be a harmless one, let's fix it.
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlas...@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.br...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 671256d..4969f64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -4300,7 +4300,8 @@ static cycle_t e1000e_cyclecounter_read(const struct
cyclecounter *cc)
}
if ((hw->mac.type == e1000_82574) || (hw->mac.type == e1000_82583)) {
- u64 incvalue, time_delta, rem, temp;
+ u64 time_delta, rem, temp;
+ u32 incvalue;
int i;
/* errata for 82574/82583 possible bad bits read from SYSTIMH/L
--
2.5.5
