Hi David, Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> writes:
> Now that the bridge code defers the switchdev port state setting, there > is no need to defer the port STP state change within the mv88e6xxx code. > Thus get rid of the driver's bridge work code. > > This also fixes a race condition where the DSA layer assumes that the > bridge code already set the unbridged port's STP state to Disabled > before restoring the Forwarding state. > > As a consequence, this also fixes the FDB flush for the unbridged port > which now correctly occurs during the Forwarding to Disabled transition. > > Fixes: 0bc05d585d38 ("switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set > as deferred") > Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.dide...@savoirfairelinux.com> This patch doesn't apply to -net, only applies to net-next... How should I handle that, do I resend a patch for net-next with the good subject prefix, and a v2 for -net? Sorry for the noise, Vivien