On 16-05-18 01:17 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote:
diff --git a/net/sched/act_bpf.c b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
index 014f9a6..f581e01 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_bpf.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_bpf.c
@@ -156,6 +156,7 @@ static int tcf_bpf_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
tc_action *act,

         tm.install = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - prog->tcf_tm.install);
         tm.lastuse = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - prog->tcf_tm.lastuse);
+       tm.firstuse = jiffies_to_clock_t(jiffies - prog->tcf_tm.firstuse);
         tm.expires = jiffies_to_clock_t(prog->tcf_tm.expires);


I think it is the time to add a wrapper for these tm.XX =
jiffies_to_clock_t(XXX).


Agreed. Will send a patch.
Actually I will resend the firstuse as well without RFC tag
and the wrapper one as separate patch.

cheers,
jamal

Reply via email to