On 06/03/2016 01:37 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
There is no reason in this lock. At least for now.Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronz...@linaro.org> --- Based on master drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c index 9919cb3..8d1d373 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c @@ -365,7 +365,6 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave *slave, u32 val, u32 offset) } struct cpsw_priv { - spinlock_t lock; struct platform_device *pdev; struct net_device *ndev; struct napi_struct napi_rx; @@ -2413,7 +2412,6 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dual_emac(struct platform_device *pdev, } priv_sl2 = netdev_priv(ndev); - spin_lock_init(&priv_sl2->lock); priv_sl2->data = *data; priv_sl2->pdev = pdev; priv_sl2->ndev = ndev; @@ -2533,7 +2531,6 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ndev); priv = netdev_priv(ndev); - spin_lock_init(&priv->lock); priv->pdev = pdev; priv->ndev = ndev; priv->dev = &ndev->dev;
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com> -- regards, -grygorii
