The functionality seems OK to me, though there are some
style/formatting issues, which checkpatch.pl picks up:
> ./scripts/checkpatch.pl
> net-next-tcp-accept-RST-if-SEQ-matches-right-edge-of-right-most-SACK-block.patch
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#73: FILE: net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5199:
+ /* RFC 5961 3.2 (extended to match against SACK too if
available):
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#74: FILE: net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5200:
+ * If seq num exactly matches RCV.NXT or the
right-most SACK block,
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#88: FILE: net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5213:
+ for (this_sack = 1; this_sack <
tp->rx_opt.num_sacks; ++this_sack) {
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#89: FILE: net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5214:
+ max_sack =
after(sp[this_sack].end_seq, max_sack) ?
WARNING: line over 80 characters
#90: FILE: net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:5215:
+
sp[this_sack].end_seq : max_sack;
total: 0 errors, 5 warnings, 0 checks, 40 lines checked
neal
