On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Paul Moore <pmo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com>
>
> It seems risky to always rely on the caller to ensure the socket's
> address family is correct before passing it to the NetLabel kAPI,
> especially since we see at least one LSM which didn't. Add address
> family checks to the *_delattr() functions to help prevent future
> problems.
>
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
> Reported-by: Maninder Singh <maninder...@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <p...@paul-moore.com>
> ---
>  net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c |   12 ++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

DaveM, since this is such a trivial fix I'm adding it into my
selinux#next branch right now, but if you would prefer to carry it via
netdev#next let me know.

> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
> index 1325776..bd007a9 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_kapi.c
> @@ -824,7 +824,11 @@ socket_setattr_return:
>   */
>  void netlbl_sock_delattr(struct sock *sk)
>  {
> -       cipso_v4_sock_delattr(sk);
> +       switch (sk->sk_family) {
> +       case AF_INET:
> +               cipso_v4_sock_delattr(sk);
> +               break;
> +       }
>  }
>
>  /**
> @@ -987,7 +991,11 @@ req_setattr_return:
>  */
>  void netlbl_req_delattr(struct request_sock *req)
>  {
> -       cipso_v4_req_delattr(req);
> +       switch (req->rsk_ops->family) {
> +       case AF_INET:
> +               cipso_v4_req_delattr(req);
> +               break;
> +       }
>  }
>
>  /**
>

-- 
paul moore
security @ redhat

Reply via email to