> On Jun 8, 2016, at 10:01 PM, Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:41 PM, David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>>> On 6/8/16 9:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
>>> In case a qdisc is used on a vrf device, we need to use different
>>> lockdep classes to avoid false positives.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f9eb8aea2a1e ("net_sched: transform qdisc running bit into a
>>> seqcount")
>>> Reported-by: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
>>
>>
>> same result with this patch set.
>
> Are you stacking multiple vrf devices ?
No. You can also look at ipvlan. It shows the same trace. For me it is 3
commands that create the vrf, add eth1, run ping.
