Le 29/06/2016 03:12, David Miller a écrit : > From: Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 18:19:28 -0700 > >> 2016-06-27 18:05 GMT-07:00 Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>: >>> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:52:37PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> This patch series adds support for platform data using the new code from >>>> net/dsa/dsa2.c. The motivation behind this is that we have a bit of in tree >>>> platforms (ar7, bcm47xx, x86, others) that could be benefiting from the new >>>> dsa_register_switch() API model but do not support Device Tree, nor is >>>> there a >>>> plan to bring Device Tree to these platforms (time vs. benefits). >>> >>> Hi Florian >>> >>> Please could you convert an in tree device to actually use this. >> >> Sure, I don't think there are going to be in tree users who need the >> dsa2_port_link information most of what we have is typically single >> chip, and so in that case, we can even re-use the existing >> dsa_platform_data. > > I assume therefore that this series will be resubmitted with an > accompanying example in-tree conversion. >
That is correct, although patches 1-4 could be applied immediately as they are mostly preparatory steps to patches 5-6, I don't mind resending this at a later time though (probably for the next net-next merge window I assume). -- Florian
