On Tue,  5 Jul 2016 10:53:38 -0500
Eli Cohen <e...@mellanox.com> wrote:

>  
> +static int extract_guid(__u64 *guid, char *arg)
> +{
> +     __u64 ret;
> +     int g[8];
> +     int err;
> +
> +     err = sscanf(arg, "%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x:%02x",
> +                  g, g + 1, g + 2, g + 3, g + 4, g + 5, g + 6, g + 7);
> +     if (err != 8)
> +             return -1;
> +
> +     ret = ((__u64)(g[0]) << 56) |
> +           ((__u64)(g[1]) << 48) |
> +           ((__u64)(g[2]) << 40) |
> +           ((__u64)(g[3]) << 32) |
> +           ((__u64)(g[4]) << 24) |
> +           ((__u64)(g[5]) << 16) |
> +           ((__u64)(g[6]) << 8) |
> +           ((__u64)(g[7]));
> +     *guid = ret;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}

I would like several things changed here.
 1. put this in generic (ie lib/utils.c) so that other places
    can use it. And rename it match other arg parsing code (ie get_guid)
 2. need range checking for each piece the string, and each hex piece must be 
unsigned int
    suprised gcc format checks didn't bust you on this.  why not %hhx as format 
specifier
    
 3. arg should be const char *
 4. local variable err is really unnecessary
 5. local variable ret is unnecessary, you could just assign to *guid
 

Reply via email to