On 07/08/2016 12:54 PM, Vishwanath Pai wrote: > On 07/08/2016 12:37 PM, David Laight wrote: >> If you think some users would still want 32bit limits, then you should >> (probably) use a _64 suffix for the new functions. >> >> David > > I am proposing a new revision for hashlimit that supports a higher rate > along with a few other changes/fixes (in separate patches). Hence the > prefix _v2 for the new functions. > > - Vish >
I'm sorry _v1 for the old functions, the new functions (for rev2) don't have a suffix.
