From: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidm...@intel.com>
In ixgbevf_reset_subtask We weren't verifying that the port haven't
been removed, we are with this patch.
Signed-off-by: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidm...@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bow...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
index 7dc4245..201e482 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c
@@ -2774,6 +2774,7 @@ static void ixgbevf_reset_subtask(struct ixgbevf_adapter
*adapter)
/* If we're already down or resetting, just bail */
if (test_bit(__IXGBEVF_DOWN, &adapter->state) ||
+ test_bit(__IXGBEVF_REMOVING, &adapter->state) ||
test_bit(__IXGBEVF_RESETTING, &adapter->state))
return;
--
2.5.5
