On Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:15:40 +0300
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com> wrote:

> Mark CPSW Rx/Tx IRQs as IRQF_NO_THREAD and avoid double scheduling on -RT
> where this IRQs are forced threaded:
>  rx-irq
>   |- schedule threaded rx-irq handler
> ...
>   |- threaded rx-irq handler -> cpsw_rx_interrupt()
>      |- napi_schedule()
>       |- __raise_softirq_irqoff()
>          |- wakeup_proper_softirq()
> ...
>   napi
> 
> after:
>  rx-irq
>   |- cpsw_rx_interrupt()
>      |- napi_schedule()
>   |- irq_exit()
>      |- invoke_softirq()
>          |- wakeup_softirqd()
> ...
>   napi
> 
> And, as result, get benefits from the following improvements (tested
> on am57xx-evm):
> 
> 1) "[ 78.348599] NOHZ: local_softirq_pending 80" message will not be
>    seen any more. Now these warnings can be seen once iperf is started.
>    # iperf -c $IPERFHOST -w 128K  -d -t 60
> 
> 2) latency reduction when cyclictest is run in parallel with network load
>  where net_perf.sh is:
>    iperf -c $IPERFHOST -w 8K    -d -t 60
>    iperf -c $IPERFHOST -w 16K   -d -t 60
>    iperf -c $IPERFHOST -w 32K   -d -t 60
>    iperf -c $IPERFHOST -w 64K   -d -t 60
>    iperf -c $IPERFHOST -w 128K  -d -t 60
> 
> before:
> T: 0 ( 1326) P:98 I:1000 C: 240000 Min:      8 Act:   13 Avg:   18 Max:      
> 70
> T: 1 ( 1327) P:98 I:1500 C: 159981 Min:      9 Act:   15 Avg:   16 Max:      
> 43
> after:
> T: 0 ( 1331) P:98 I:1000 C: 240000 Min:      8 Act:   15 Avg:   14 Max:      
> 51
> T: 1 ( 1332) P:98 I:1500 C: 159953 Min:      8 Act:   16 Avg:   15 Max:      
> 33
> 
> 3) network performance increase
> 
> win, K        Mbits/s
>       before  after   %
> 8K    354     350.3   0.0
> 16K   412     551     33.7
> 32K   423     659.5   55.9
> 64K   436     728.3   67.0
> 128K  537     845     57.4
> 
> This change does not affect on non-RT.

This looks fine to me, but it should go into the development branch,
which is currently 4.6-rt. And I can then pull it from there.

-- Steve


> 
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
> ---
> Hi All,
> 
> I'll be appreciated on any feedback or tested-by.
> In case of positive feedback I'll resend it for upstream.
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 7b59283..fa4bb81 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cpsw_tx_interrupt(int irq, void 
> *dev_id)
>               priv->tx_irq_disabled = true;
>       }
>  
> -     napi_schedule(&priv->napi_tx);
> +     napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->napi_tx);
>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> @@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static irqreturn_t cpsw_rx_interrupt(int irq, void 
> *dev_id)
>               priv->rx_irq_disabled = true;
>       }
>  
> -     napi_schedule(&priv->napi_rx);
> +     napi_schedule_irqoff(&priv->napi_rx);
>       return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  
> @@ -2827,7 +2827,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>       priv->irqs_table[0] = irq;
>       ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_rx_interrupt,
> -                            0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
> +                            IRQF_NO_THREAD, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
>       if (ret < 0) {
>               dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
>               goto clean_ale_ret;
> @@ -2842,7 +2842,7 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>       priv->irqs_table[1] = irq;
>       ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, cpsw_tx_interrupt,
> -                            0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
> +                            IRQF_NO_THREAD, dev_name(&pdev->dev), priv);
>       if (ret < 0) {
>               dev_err(priv->dev, "error attaching irq (%d)\n", ret);
>               goto clean_ale_ret;

Reply via email to