On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:09:20PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> ebpf approach does have its shortcomings for sure but mending them
> seems a lot more manageable and future-proof than going with fixed but
> constantly expanding set of operations. e.g. We can add per-cgroup
> bpf programs which are called only on socket creation or other major
> events, or just let bpf programs which get called on bind(2), and add
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
please ignore this part. half-assed edit.
--
tejun
