Calling 'list_splice' followed by 'INIT_LIST_HEAD' is equivalent to
'list_splice_init'.
This has been spotted with the following coccinelle script:
/////
@@
expression y,z;
@@
- list_splice(y,z);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(y);
+ list_splice_init(y,z);
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
---
net/rds/loop.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rds/loop.c b/net/rds/loop.c
index f2bf78de5688..c3e6da4fdf97 100644
--- a/net/rds/loop.c
+++ b/net/rds/loop.c
@@ -167,8 +167,7 @@ void rds_loop_exit(void)
/* avoid calling conn_destroy with irqs off */
spin_lock_irq(&loop_conns_lock);
- list_splice(&loop_conns, &tmp_list);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&loop_conns);
+ list_splice_init(&loop_conns, &tmp_list);
spin_unlock_irq(&loop_conns_lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe(lc, _lc, &tmp_list, loop_node) {
--
2.7.4
