On 09/07/2016 10:34 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>

When DATA and/or FIN are carried in a SYN/ACK message or SYN message,
we append an skb in socket receive queue, but we forget to call
sk_forced_mem_schedule().

Effect is that the socket has a negative sk->sk_forward_alloc as long as
the message is not read by the application.

Josh Hunt fixed a similar issue in commit d22e15371811 ("tcp: fix tcp
fin memory accounting")

Fixes: 168a8f58059a ("tcp: TCP Fast Open Server - main code path")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
---
  net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c |    1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c
index 62a5751d4fe1..4e777a3243f9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c
@@ -150,6 +150,7 @@ void tcp_fastopen_add_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff 
*skb)
        tp->segs_in = 0;
        tcp_segs_in(tp, skb);
        __skb_pull(skb, tcp_hdrlen(skb));
+       sk_forced_mem_schedule(sk, skb->truesize);
        skb_set_owner_r(skb, sk);

        TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq++;



The change makes sense to me. Thanks Eric!

Reviewed-by: Josh Hunt <joh...@akamai.com>

Reply via email to