On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Rick Jones <rick.jon...@hpe.com> wrote: > On 09/09/2016 02:53 PM, Mahesh Bandewar wrote: > >> @@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ master device for the L2 processing and routing from >> that instance will be >> used before packets are queued on the outbound device. In this mode the >> slaves >> will not receive nor can send multicast / broadcast traffic. >> >> +4.3 L3S mode: >> + This is very similar to the L3 mode except that iptables >> conn-tracking >> +works in this mode and that is why L3-symsetric (L3s) from iptables >> perspective. >> +This will have slightly less performance but that shouldn't matter since >> you >> +are choosing this mode over plain-L3 mode to make conn-tracking work. > > > What is that first sentence trying to say? It appears to be incomplete, and > is that supposed to be "L3-symmetric?" > Apologies! Seems like I picked up wrong text file (I'll correct this in next ver). BTW it should read - " This is very similar to L3 mode except that iptables (conn-tracking) works in this mode and hence it is L3-symmetric (L3s). This will have ..."
> happy benchmarking, > > rick jones
