If 'inet_diag_lock_handler()' returns an error, we should not call
'inet_diag_unlock_handler()' on it.
'handler' is not a valid mutexc in this case.

This has been spotted with the folowing coccinelle script:
////////////////////////////
@@
expression x;
identifier f;
@@

*   if (IS_ERR(x))
    {
       ...
*      f(<+... x ...+>);
       ...
    }

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
---
 net/ipv4/inet_diag.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
index abfbe492ebfe..795af25cf84c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/inet_diag.c
@@ -1134,7 +1134,6 @@ int inet_diag_handler_get_info(struct sk_buff *skb, 
struct sock *sk)
 
        handler = inet_diag_lock_handler(sk->sk_protocol);
        if (IS_ERR(handler)) {
-               inet_diag_unlock_handler(handler);
                nlmsg_cancel(skb, nlh);
                return PTR_ERR(handler);
        }
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to