On 09/14/2016 05:25 PM, Richard Cochran wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:02:30PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >> @@ -427,9 +427,6 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts) >> u64 ns; >> u64 frac; >> >> - if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift) >> - return; >> - >> freq = clk_get_rate(cpts->refclk); >> >> /* Calc the maximum number of seconds which we can run before > > This hunk has nothing to do with $subject.
Sry, but I did not get your comment here :( I'd happy to update patch according to your request, but could you provide more info here, pls? > >> @@ -442,11 +439,20 @@ static void cpts_calc_mult_shift(struct cpts *cpts) >> else if (maxsec > 600 && cpts->cc.mask > UINT_MAX) >> maxsec = 600; >> >> + /* Calc overflow check period (maxsec / 2) */ >> + cpts->ov_check_period = (HZ * maxsec) / 2; >> + dev_info(cpts->dev, "cpts: overflow check period %lu\n", >> + cpts->ov_check_period); >> + >> + if (cpts->cc_mult || cpts->cc.shift) >> + return; >> + >> clocks_calc_mult_shift(&mult, &shift, freq, NSEC_PER_SEC, maxsec); >> >> cpts->cc_mult = mult; >> cpts->cc.mult = mult; >> cpts->cc.shift = shift; >> + > > Nor does this. -- regards, -grygorii
