On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 04:59:10PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > package follows that licensing model for accepting any new code into > > that combined repo ? > > As with the kernel we'd discourage 're-licensing' existing files. > > However, since this is not a OFA project, I, personally, would not > turn away a GPLv2 compatible contribution, but I am proposing that the > 'default' license for the project be OFA compatible.
I should be clearer here. I am *strongly* opposed to anything that changes the license of the existing 4 core libraries away from the GPLv2 or OpenIB.org situation we have today. (that includes to other varients of the BSD license) I just checked and we appear to be completely OK on this point today. Jason
