From: "#ZHOU BIN#" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 16:30:48 +0800

> Yes, I agree. Actually the main contribution of TCP Veno is not in
> this AI phase. No matter the ABC is added or not, TCP Veno can
> always improve the performance over wireless networks, according to
> our tests.

It seems to me that the wireless issue is seperate from congestion
control.

The key is to identify "true loss" due to overflow of intermediate
router queues, vs. "false loss" which is due to temporary radio
signal interference.

This determination is a job for the loss detection in the generic ACK
processing code in tcp_input.c, not for a congestion control algorithm.
The congestion control algorithm uses the "true loss" information to
make congestion control decisions.

We already have code that tries to make this differentiation, in the
form of FRTO, and your techniques can likely be placed there as well.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to