Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net sched: stylistic cleanups

[Cong Wang]

On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 5:45 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote:
>         rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_NEWQDISC, tc_modify_qdisc, NULL, NULL);
>         rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_DELQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, NULL, NULL);
> -       rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, tc_dump_qdisc, 
> NULL);
> +       rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETQDISC, tc_get_qdisc, tc_dump_qdisc,
> +                     NULL);
>         rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_NEWTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, NULL, NULL);
>         rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_DELTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, NULL, NULL);
> -       rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, 
> tc_dump_tclass, NULL);
> +       rtnl_register(PF_UNSPEC, RTM_GETTCLASS, tc_ctl_tclass, tc_dump_tclass,
> +                     NULL);

Keeping them in the same line is more readable, IMHO.