On 09/19/2016 02:10 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Stephen Hemminger
<step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
Looks good, but could I suggest a simple optimization.
All these parameters are immutable in the version of BBR you are submitting.
Why not make the values const? And eliminate the always true long-term bw
estimate
variable?
We could do that.
We used to have variables (aka module params) while BBR was cooking in
our kernels ;)
Are there better than epsilon odds of someone perhaps wanting to poke
those values as it gets exposure beyond Google?
happy benchmarking,
rick jones
