Meelis Roos wrote: >> Very strange, this means that the initial table data must somehow >> be wrong, but for some reason it still seems to get past the >> size and offset checks for the filter table. I can't see how >> loading the filter table could fail after the "Finished chain .." >> messages without another message. Which kernel version did you >> perform these test on? > > > Yesterdays 2.6.17-rc5+git.
Please enable DEBUG_IP_FIREWALL_USER in net/netfilter/x_tables.c as well and retry. Results of the raw or mangle table would also be interesting because they contain a different number of built-in chains. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
