On 10/31/2016 05:58 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:58:38 -0700
> 
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> index 6b62ee9a2f78..73da296c2125 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ enum bpf_prog_type {
>>      BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT,
>>      BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
>>      BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT,
>> -    BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
>> +    BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP,
>>  };
>>  
>>  enum bpf_attach_type {
> 
> If we do this then the cgroup-bpf series should use this value rather than
> changing it after-the-fact in your series here.
> 

Yeah, I'm confused too. I changed that name in my v7 from
BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK to BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB on David's (Ahern)
request. Why is it now renamed again?


Thanks,
Daniel

Reply via email to