----- Original Message -----
> From: "Florian Westphal" <f...@strlen.de>
> To: "Lance Richardson" <lrich...@redhat.com>
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, f...@strlen.de, jtl...@redhat.com
> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 1:20:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv4: allow local fragmentation in 
> ip_finish_output_gso()
> 
> Lance Richardson <lrich...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Some configurations (e.g. geneve interface with default
> > MTU of 1500 over an ethernet interface with 1500 MTU) result
> > in the transmission of packets that exceed the configured MTU.
> > While this should be considered to be a "bad" configuration,
> > it is still allowed and should not result in the sending
> > of packets that exceed the configured MTU.
> > 
> > Fix by dropping the assumption in ip_finish_output_gso() that
> > locally originated gso packets will never need fragmentation.
> > Basic testing using iperf (observing CPU usage and bandwidth)
> > have shown no measurable performance impact for traffic not
> > requiring fragmentation.
> > 
> > Fixes: c7ba65d7b649 ("net: ip: push gso skb forwarding handling down the
> > stack")
> > Reported-by: Jan Tluka <jtl...@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lance Richardson <lrich...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 6 ++----
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > index 03e7f73..4971401 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
> > @@ -239,11 +239,9 @@ static int ip_finish_output_gso(struct net *net,
> > struct sock *sk,
> >     struct sk_buff *segs;
> >     int ret = 0;
> >  
> > -   /* common case: fragmentation of segments is not allowed,
> > -    * or seglen is <= mtu
> > +   /* common case: seglen is <= mtu
> >      */
> > -   if (((IPCB(skb)->flags & IPSKB_FRAG_SEGS) == 0) ||
> > -         skb_gso_validate_mtu(skb, mtu))
> > +   if (skb_gso_validate_mtu(skb, mtu))
> 
> IPSKB_FRAG_SEGS is now useless and should be removed.
> 

Thanks, Florian, I've removed IPSKB_FRAG_SEGS in v2.

   Lance

Reply via email to