> -----Original Message----- > From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:h...@infradead.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 3, 2016 7:46 AM > To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@infradead.org>; Duyck, Alexander H > <alexander.h.du...@intel.com>; linux...@kvack.org; akpm@linux- > foundation.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [mm PATCH v2 01/26] swiotlb: Drop unused functions > swiotlb_map_sg and swiotlb_unmap_sg > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 10:29:52AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > Somehow I thought you wanted to put them through your tree (which is > > why I acked them). > > > > I can take them and also the first couple of Alexander through my > > tree. Or if it makes it simpler - they can go through the -mm tree? > > I don't have a tree for it, so I kinda expected you to pick it up. > But I'm also fine with you just Acking the version from Alex and having him > funnel it through whatever tree he wants to get his patches in through.
For the first 3 patches in my series I am fine with them being pulled into the swiotlb tree. So if you want to pull Christoph's two patches, and then drop my duplicate patch and instead pull the next 2 I could submit a v3 of my series without the swiotlb patches in it. At this point I have redone my series so that I technically don't have anything with a hard dependency on the DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC actually doing anything yet. My plan is to get this all into Linus's tree first via whatever tree I can get these patches pulled into and once I have all that I will start updating drivers in net-next. Thanks. - Alex
