Nathaniel Case wrote:
On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 10:58 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
+static u32 gfar_get_link(struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct gfar_private *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ struct phy_device *phydev = priv->phydev;
+
+ if (NULL == phydev)
+ return -ENODEV;
NAK, return code obviously wrong
Thanks. I think we can just return 0 for that case. Updated patch
follows.
Signed-off-by: Nate Case <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sigh. See rule #6: http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
You excised the patch description, which means your patch can no longer
be applied correctly by scripts.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
