Hi David, On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 9:33 AM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote: > From: f...@ikuai8.com > Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:28:49 +0800 > >> From: Gao Feng <f...@ikuai8.com> >> >> When there is no existing macvlan port in lowdev, one new macvlan port >> would be created. But it doesn't be destoried when something failed later. >> It casues some memleak. >> >> Now add one flag to indicate if new macvlan port is created. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gao Feng <f...@ikuai8.com> > > You need to be more patient, it sometimes take several days before > your get patch reviewed or applied. Sometimes nobody reviews a change > for some time because it is obscure or everyone is busy.
Sorry, it is my fault. I thought this patch may be lost because there are too many emails every day. So ping just as a reminder. > > All patches are tracked in patchwork, so it is never an issue of a > change getting "lost". Therefore, it never makes sense to ping the > list again and ask if a change is "ok". > > Personally, when people ping like that, it makes me want to review > that patch _less_ not more. So please do not do it. > > Thank you. > Now I get it. I violated some rules as a fresh man in kernel community. Sorry again. Best Regards Feng
