Hello.
On 11/07/2016 06:27 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
From: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi...@renesas.com>
The kernel panic occurs with "swiotlb buffer is full" message
after repeating suspend and resume, because dma_map_single of
ravb_ring_format and ravb_start_xmit is not released.
The same issue must occur after several ifconfig up/down I think...
this is quite embarrassing actually, and I think this bug was inherited from
sh_eth. Perhaps it was made more visible with adding PM support. :-/
This patch adds dma_unmap_single in ravb_ring_free, and fixes
its problem.
Well, actually ravb_ring_free() was meant to undo what ravb_ring_init()
does...
Signed-off-by: Kazuya Mizuguchi <kazuya.mizuguchi...@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+rene...@verge.net.au>
---
Sergei, this is a patch from the Gen3 3.3.2 BSP.
I suspect the ravb driver there is greatly different from the upstream one...
Please consider if it is appropriate for mainline.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
index 27cfec3154c8..e44629b75c83 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
@@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ static void ravb_ring_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
int ring_size;
int i;
+ struct ravb_ex_rx_desc *rx_desc;
+ struct ravb_tx_desc *tx_desc;
+ u32 size;
DaveM prefers the local declarations in the reverse Xmas tree order; me
too. :-)
[...]
@@ -207,6 +210,16 @@ static void ravb_ring_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
priv->tx_align[q] = NULL;
if (priv->rx_ring[q]) {
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) {
+ rx_desc = &priv->rx_ring[q][i];
+ if (rx_desc->dptr != 0) {
This seems wrong. This driver uses RX descriptors with zero data size to
indicate the failed DMA mapping. And anyway, I think you should have used
dma_mapping_error() instead of a zero check... and '!= 0' was unnecessary.
+ dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
+ le32_to_cpu(rx_desc->dptr),
+ PKT_BUF_SZ,
+ DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+ rx_desc->dptr = 0;
Hence I'd prefer:
rx_desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(0);
[...]
@@ -215,6 +228,16 @@ static void ravb_ring_free(struct net_device *ndev, int q)
}
if (priv->tx_ring[q]) {
+ for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_ring[q]; i++) {
I'm afraid this is wrong. TX ring contains NUM_TX_DESC (2) descriptors per
skb, so this loop only cleans the 1st half of the TX ring.
+ tx_desc = &priv->tx_ring[q][i];
+ size = le16_to_cpu(tx_desc->ds_tagl) & TX_DS;
+ if (tx_desc->dptr != 0) {
+ dma_unmap_single(ndev->dev.parent,
+ le32_to_cpu(tx_desc->dptr),
+ size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
+ tx_desc->dptr = 0;
Again, I'm not fond of this... are you sure 0 is incorrect DMA address?
+ }
+ }
BTW, can't we use ravb_tx_free() instead of this loop?
MBR, Sergei
