From: David Lebrun <david.leb...@uclouvain.be> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 09:19:28 +0100
> The Kconfig knob was a response to the concern that direct header > insertion breaks things. Moreover, if the IETF decides that direct > header insertion must be explicitely banned in rfc2460bis, then at > least we do not have a non-RFC compliant behavior by default. Sysadmins should be allowed to do what they wish. Most packet filtering and mangling we support is technically not RFC compliant, so using that as an argument against supporting this or that facility is kind of silly.
