From: David Lebrun <david.leb...@uclouvain.be> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:17:20 +0100
> On 11/14/2016 03:22 PM, Roopa Prabhu wrote: >> I prefer option b). most LWTUNNEL encaps are done this way. >> >> seg6 and seg6_iptunnel is new segment routing code and can be under >> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 which depends on CONFIG_LWTUNNEL and CONFIG_IPV6. >> CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_HMAC could then depend on CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6 > > Will do that, thanks This is good for the time being. Although I'd like to entertain the idea of making LWTUNNEL unconditionally built and considered a fundamental piece of networking infrastructure just like net/core/dst.c
