From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:03:56 +1000
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 08:57:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > regarding your point wrt. path of integration - it is pretty much the > > only practical way to do this centrally as part of the lock validator > > patches, but to collect ACKs from subsystem maintainers in the process. > > So if you like it i'd like to have your ACK but this patch depends on > > the other lock validator patches (and only makes sense together with > > them), so they should temporarily stay in the lock validator queue. > > Hopefully this wont be a state that lasts too long and once the > > validator is upstream, all patches of course go via the subsystem > > submission rules. > > Obviously as long as Dave is happy with it then it's fine. However, > it's probably a good idea to cc netdev for relevant patches so that > they get a wider review. If you've already sent this one there then > I apologise for missing it :) Yes, this is fine with me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
